Mon premier blog

Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code Don Roberts, John Brant, Kent Beck, Martin Fowler, William Opdyke
Publisher: Addison-Wesley Professional

Martin, “SRP: The Single Responsibility Principle”, http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/articles/srp.pdf. In this post I'll discuss some of the disadvantages of modules, and suggest that Ruby programmers should see them as a method of last resort for code sharing only after carefully considering alternative approaches such as creating classes. For instance, RTL refactoring can be used to abstract and understand a design [6], prepare a design for other purposes such as validation or elastization [2], optimize a design for specific tools such as synthesis or to simply improve the design of existing code [3]. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Refactoring Improving the Design of Existing Code Replacing the Conditional Logic on Price Code with Polymorphism . Final Thoughts Refactoring Helps You Find Bugs . Fowler, “Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code” location 3320; B. Refactoring is defined as a disciplined technique for restructuring an existing body of code, altering its internal structure without changing its external behavior. [3, 4] In his book on refactoring . I've long been told that this book is one of the must-reads for developers. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code ▻ 04/11 - 04/18 (6). Martin Fowler's discussion book and catalogue of common refactorings is a hugely interesting read. In 2003, I published a Perl 5 “translation” of the first chapter of the book “Refactoring - Improving the Design of Existing Code”, Addison Wesley, by Martin Fowler et al., on my website. Where Did Refactoring Come From? Guided by Tests” location 1258; M. After picking it up a few months ago, it took me a while to finish reading it. I think people see refactoring as a difficult process. €�Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Kabz writes “Refactoring (as I'll refer to the book from here on in) is a heavy and beautifully produced 418 page hardback book. Design is hard; so improving design of existing code must be hard, as well, right?